loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

The Battle Is Joined: Two New Entrants in the Fight Over New Overtime Rules


Two new sets of allied combatants have joined the fray looking to overturn the Department of Labor’s (DOL) new overtime regulations and halt the imminent effective date. The DOL’s new rules more than double the salary threshold (to $47,476) for workers to even be considered for the so-called “white collar” exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) overtime premium requirements and are currently scheduled to take effect Dec. 1. On Sept. 20, two complaints were filed in the Eastern District of Texas: one by a coalition of more than 50 business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and one by a group of 21 states (represented by their attorneys general), led by Texas and Nevada. The states, as government employers, argue that the new regulations could force cuts in government services, unconstitutionally mandate how state employees are paid, unilaterally and unlawfully deplete state resources, and ignore the text of the FLSA by focusing on salary thresholds as opposed to whether employees are performing executive, administrative, or professional duties that currently render them exempt from overtime premiums. The states also decry the automatic indexing provision that would increase the salary threshold every three years, contending that future increases should be subject to notice and comment. For those curious, the following states joined Texas and Nevada in their complaint: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah and Wisconsin. The business coalition echoes many of these concerns, arguing that the new regulations are an overreach by the DOL and the executive branch under the Administrative Procedures Act, that the DOL’s reasons for increasing the threshold don’t comport with the language of the FLSA, and that the careers of many employees across the country will be adversely effected when employers are forced to reclassify them as hourly instead of salaried workers. For their part, the Obama administration and proponents of the new overtime rules are confident in the legality of the regulations. Further, although the plaintiffs were no doubt trying to take advantage of what they perceive to be a potentially friendly district court in Texas – the same state where a federal judge recently enjoined the DOL’s controversial persuader rule – the DOL may have caught a break when both cases were assigned to the only district judge in the Eastern District of Texas appointed by President Obama. Obviously, this watershed topic is important to countless businesses across the country, and is only going to heat up in the next weeks and months. BT Currents will be following the developments closely.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Recent DOL Guidance Not Entitled to Deference Post-Kisor

July 10, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Lessons

DOL Proposes Long-Awaited New Minimum Salary for Overtime Exemption

March 11, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act

Seventh Circuit Revisits Contractor Misclassification

June 28, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

Final Rule Issued on HIRE Vets Medallion Program

November 10, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

A Welcome Move for Employers - Department of Labor Re-Establishes Wage and Hour Opinion Letters

July 6, 2017 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.