loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Debate Continues Over President's NLRB Recess Appointments

December 5, 2012 |  uncategorized


Several media outlets and political pundits are weighing in on the ongoing legal battle over President Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. Our prior reports on this topic can be found here.

On one side, the Wall Street Journal editorial board opined that President Obama “is exceeding his constitutional authority” with the appointments. They argue that following the President's logic would mean he “could presumably make recess appointments every weekend, or during lunch.” The editorial concludes that the recess appointments were a "power grab" and should be overturned in court. The full editorial can be found here.

A contrary opinion is penned for the Huffington Post by Victor Williams, Clinical Assistant Professor, Catholic University of America School of Law. Williams writes that the appointments were made during a twenty-one day Senate break when “the Senate conducted no business and considered no communications from the president.” He argues the "the seconds-long pro forma sessions held every three days were embarrassing faux sessions lacking legal or constitutional significance." His full post can be found here.

With several cases pending on this issue, the courts of appeal around the country will begin to weigh in this topic in the coming weeks.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.