loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?


We knew this question would be asked. On Sept. 7, a petition was filed in this country’s highest court, asking it to settle the ongoing debate of whether Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination includes discrimination based on sexual orientation. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit case, Jameka K. Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital, et al., involves a gay female security guard at a Georgia hospital who was allegedly harassed and not promoted because of her sexual orientation. She sued the hospital under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlaws employment discrimination and harassment based on sex. But, she lost at each step. The district court and the Eleventh Circuit rejected Evans’ clams because she was complaining about conduct based on her sexual orientation—not based on her sex. For years, courts have upheld that precise distinction, but that position is starting to show its cracks. Earlier this year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (NY, CT, VT) noted that sexual orientation discrimination is sex discrimination, but still rejected the plaintiff’s claim under the current state of the law. (Christiansen v. Omnicom Grp. Inc., 852 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2017)) And, most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (IN, IL and WI) ruled in favor of a lesbian teacher claiming discrimination, relying on the “logic of the Supreme Court’s decisions, as well as the common-sense reality that it is actually impossible to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation without discriminating on the basis of sex.” Hively v. Ivy Tech Cmty. Coll., 853 F.3d 339 (7th Cir. 2017) (en banc). Late last week, Lambda Legal, the gay rights advocacy organization, filed the petition in the Supreme Court on behalf of the lesbian security guard. The petition highlights the divide among the circuits and asks the court to “bring Title VII into line with society’s contemporary understandings concerning sexual orientation and sex discrimination.” Of course, asking the question does not mean the Supreme Court is obliged to answer it.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Indiana Federal Court Gives Frostbitten ADA Plaintiff The Cold Shoulder

November 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Sixth Circuit Confirms Standard for 'Regarded As' Discrimination Under the ADA

November 12, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims

October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act

Big Changes For Illinois Employers: Workplace Transparency Act

September 24, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct

Navigating Discrimination Claims With Strong Documentation

September 6, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Discrimination
sexual orientation discrimination
Supreme Court
Title VII
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.