loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

UBER Arbitration Pact Tossed


The assault on company-employee arbitration pacts by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) continues. On June 13, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruled an Uber Technologies arbitration agreement was unlawful. Uber required its software engineers to sign an agreement that compelled arbitration of claims against the company. Specifically, the ALJ held that the language in the agreement was “ambiguous” as to employees’ rights to file charges with the NLRB or otherwise access NLRB “processes.” Notably, the judge ruled this way even though a provision in the agreement explicitly stated that employees interested in filing an administrative charge with the NLRB could do so at “www.nlrb.gov” – the agency’s own website! The ALJ ordered Uber to rescind or revise its policy to more clearly state (somehow) that employees can access NLRB processes. Uber may appeal the decision to the full NLRB, but it has not done so yet. Activity on this front has been heavy lately, as this comes on the heels of a similar decision by the NLRB rendered in April. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court is in the midst of hearing arguments in a case in which employers are challenging the NLRB’s view that class action waivers in compulsory employment arbitration pacts violate the National Labor Relations Act. This case serves as another reminder for companies using or considering an arbitration program to resolve workplace disputes with its employees that the NLRB aggressively scrutinizes such agreements. Accordingly, care must be taken when drafting and implementing the agreements so they account for recent NLRB decisions and guidance. Failure to do so may result in the program being partially or wholly invalidated.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Back To Normal? Labor Board To Restart Union Elections

April 2, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Labor Board Finalizes Rule Changes to Enhance Employee Free Choice

April 1, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

Can You Conduct Collective Bargaining By Phone or Teleconference In the Age of Coronavirus?

March 26, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

NLRB Delays New Election Rule in Response to AFL-CIO Challenge

March 24, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

NLRB Suspends All Union Elections Until April 3 In Light Of Pandemic

March 19, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
National Labor Relations Act
NLRB
Uber
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.