loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Performance You Can Measure Is Best Defense, FMLA Case Demonstrates

William Nolan

William A. Nolan

Partner
Columbus Managing Partner

I often find myself counseling clients that the more measurable a performance issue is, the easier it is for the employer to prove that issue is the true, nondiscriminatory reason for a termination or other job action in the face of a discrimination or other employment claim. Sales employees almost always have measurable data about their performance, which seemingly provides an objective basis for employment decisions taken against individuals whose sales number are lowest. Such decisions are not bullet proof; for example, the employee may allege that he or she has a less favorable territory that was assigned on a discriminatory basis. In general, though, performance issues that can be backed up with data are more easily defended. On the other hand, while we all know there are employees who are just difficult to work with on the team, that performance issue is harder to prove. Saying somebody is a “bad fit” invites allegations of discrimination against somebody who is in the minority in a work force. Here, I try to get employers to drill down on the issue and provide specific instances with names, dates, and places, and how those instances are damaging to the company.  This provides harder data than general characterizations and gets the decision closer to something measurable. A recent FMLA retaliation decision from a federal court of appeals demonstrates the value of data. In Burciaga v. Ravago Americas, LLC, the Eighth Circuit addressed a claim brought by a customer service representative who was terminated for poor performance around the same time she requested leave to care for her son with a serious health condition. The company asserted that Burciaga was terminated for four identifiable shipping errors in a period of 17 days. Burciaga claimed other employees made shipping errors as well, but could not identify an employee who made four in 17 days. In the face of this data, other arguments she made were unavailing. One wonders whether, in light of the closeness in time of her leave request and her termination, the company would have prevailed had the basis for the termination not been as measurable as it was.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Proper FMLA Notice Makes for Informed Employees and Compliant Employers

November 27, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Leave

Position Is Not Vacant If It Is Being Held For an Employee on FMLA Leave

October 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues

Accommodate Much? Restrictive Seventh Circuit Leave Ruling Lives On

April 5, 2018 | EEOC, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law

Attention Illinois Employers: 3 Handbook Policies to Revisit Now

October 13, 2017 | EEOC, Employee Leave, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
FMLA
job termination
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.