loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY OF DECISIONS, JUNE 22 – 26, 2015


The Summary of NLRB decisions for the week of June 22 – 26, 2015, is now available. Summarized Board Decisions King’s Fire Protection, Inc. and its alter ego Warrior Sprinkler, LLC  (05-CA-036094 and 05-CA-036312; 362 NLRB No. 129)  Mechanicsburg, PA, June 23, 2015. In view of the Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning, 134 S.Ct. 2550 (2014), the Board considered de novo the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and order.  For the reasons stated in its now-vacated Decision and Order reported at 358 NLRB No. 156, a Board panel majority consisting of Members Hirozawa and McFerran adopted the Judge’s conclusion that the Respondents and the Charging Party Union had a bargaining relationship governed by Section 9(a), rather than Section 8(f), of the Act, and that the Respondents unlawfully terminated the bargaining relationship and failed to abide by all of the terms of the bargaining agreement that expired on March 31, 2010.  The Board majority relied solely on the language of the parties' 2005 assent and interim agreement that comported with the requirements of Central Illinois Construction (Staunton Fuel) 335 NLRB 717 (2001), for establishing a bargaining relationship under Section 9(a) in the construction industry. Member Miscimarra, dissenting in part, found that the language in the 2005 assent and interim agreement was insufficient to rebut the presumption that the bargaining relationship was governed by Section 8(f) because he found that record evidence undermined that agreement’s representation that the Union had established majority support.  He concurred in finding that the Respondents violated the Act to the extent that they failed to apply the terms of the parties’ 2007-2010 contract prior to its expiration. Charge filed by Road Sprinklers Fitters, Local Union No. 669, U.A., AFL-CIO.  Administrative Law Judge Bruce D. Rosenstein issued his decision on July 28, 2011.  Members Miscimarra, Hirozawa, and McFerran participated. To read more, visit the  NLRB’s website.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of June 6 – 10, 2016

June 24, 2016 | national-labor-relations-board

Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of May 23 – 27, 2016

June 16, 2016 | national-labor-relations-board

Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of May 16 – 20, 2016

June 10, 2016 | national-labor-relations-board

Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of May 9 – 13, 2016

June 1, 2016 | national-labor-relations-board

Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of May 2 – 6, 2016

May 25, 2016 | national-labor-relations-board

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.