loader
Page is loading...
People Talking

NLRB Continues To Validate Employee Confidentiality Provisions


A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board is noteworthy not for a unique holding or fact pattern but rather for the consistency the current NLRB has shown in applying its Boeing work rule test to validate innocuous handbook rules such as confidentiality policies. 

As has been discussed frequently on this blog, Boeing was a landmark 2017 decision in which the NLRB overruled extant labor law and set forth a new standard for determining whether a facially neutral work rule unlawfully interferes with, restrains, or coerces employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights, which include the right of employees to engage in concerted activity for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. 

Prior to Boeing, the NLRB invalidated handbook rules that it determined could be “reasonably construed” by employees as interfering with Section 7 rights. In Argos USA, LLC, the NLRB gave its stamp of approval to a confidentiality policy that prohibited employees from disclosing “confidential information,” which included “earnings” information and “employee information.” 

The concern with this policy in the pre-Boeing world was that it could be “reasonably construed” by employees to prohibit them from discussing things like employee wages and contact information with each other. This is an area the NLRB continues to strongly enforce against both union and nonunion employers, but today’s NLRB has taken a more employer-friendly approach.

In Argos USA, LLC, the NLRB explained that, under its “objectively reasonable employee” standard, the policy was understood to be referring to the company’s earnings information and to employee information belonging to the company. In other words, staffing information and not employee wage or contact information.

While the NLRB’s consistent approach means confidentiality policies limited to company information will be facially lawful, both union and nonunion employers should remember that the rule must still be applied lawfully and that employees do have a right to discuss issues related to their employment.


RELATED ARTICLES

Catch-22? Company’s Scrutiny of Immigration Documents Deemed Unlawful

May 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Union Organizing

NLRB Nixes Telephonic Pre-Election Hearing, Orders Remote Video Hearing Instead

May 15, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Labor Law Considerations As You Restart Your Business

May 8, 2020 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership, Federal Laws and Legislation

Union Elections and Employer Considerations During Social Distancing

April 21, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership, Union Organizing

How to Respond to Union Information Requests Regarding COVID-19

April 9, 2020 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership, National Labor Relations Board

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
NLRB
Confidentiality
labor law
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.