loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Breaking - Mixed Bag Ruling In California Mixed Motive Case

Scott Witlin, Los Angeles Attorney

Scott J. Witlin

Partner
Wage and Hour Co-Chair

CaliforniaYesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its widely anticipated ruling in Harris v. City of Santa Monica regarding the burdens in so-called mixed motive discrimination cases. Our Alert on the decision can be found here.

This particular case had been pending before the court for three years, and should provide some guidance in cases where both legitimate and unlawful factors affect an employment decision.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Navigating Discrimination Claims With Strong Documentation

September 6, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Illinois EPA Amendment Lowers Standard For Discrimination Claims

August 8, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations

July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch

Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal

June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Don't Assume That One-Size-Fits-All Employment Policies Work Everywhere

April 5, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Discrimination
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.